Developments in the 19th Century that Drove the Shifts in Imperial Research Paper

Developments in the nineteenth Century that Drove the Shifts in Imperial Policies and Practices of European Empires during New Imperia - Research Paper ExampleAmongst others, these shifts include the moving away from the economic doctrine of mercantilism that focused on the expansion of trade and markets by dint of strategic control of ports towards the establishment of large scale, formal empires by way of aggressive internal insight of grime and the exercising of control oer the geography and population in those territories. We need only a glimpse at a few statistics to see that these shifts had remarkable consequences. According to Daniel R. Headrick- professor of social sciences at Roosevelt University and author of The Tools of Empire- in the year 1800 Europeans occupied or controlled thirty-five percent of the get to surface of the instauration by 1878 this figure had risen to sixty-s level percent, and by 1914 over eighty-four percent of the worlds land area was European- dominated. The British Empire alone, Headrick continues, already formidable in 1800 increased its land area sevenfold and its population twentyfold in the following hundred years.1 However, these shifts were not simply coincidental. In fact, the changes in the imperial policies of the Europeans during the era of New Imperialism were driven by two major nineteenth ampere-second developments the second industrial revolution, and the emergence of a pack of European nation states. Main Body Imperialism, as defined by the Merriam-Webster Dictionary, is the policy, practice, or advocacy of extending the power and dominion of a nation over the governmental or economic life of other areas2 To put this in simple terms, imperialism is the acquisition and buildup of territory and capital. However, the Merriam-Webster definition does not quite pin the proverbial tail on the donkey, for it lacks one key voice of imperialism what is the justification for this said extension of power? According to Edward Said- former professor of English and comparative literature at Columbia University and author of Culture and Imperialism- the acts of accumulation and acquisition are supported and perhaps even impelled by dramatic ideological formations that include notions that certain territories and people require and beseech domination, as well as forms of noesis associated with domination.3 Thus, the working definition for Imperialism from here on out is the conclave of two previous definitions, which goes as follows the policy, practice, or advocacy of extending the power and dominion of a nation over the political or economic life others, which is supported and perhaps even impelled by impressive ideological formations that include notions that certain territories and people require and beseech domination, as well as forms of knowledge associated with domination. New imperialism cannot be said to be only the policies of the elite because it was greatly supported by the dismo unt classes in Europe. The main aspect of the culture of imperialism was the feeling of superiority amongst white Europeans. Many people had such(prenominal) perceptions because of being bound by Christianity and they believed that there was nothing wrong in forcibly Christianizing the conquered societies, which they believed was the main motor of imperial missions. Some viewed imperialistic aspirations from a secular perspective, while some followed Darwinian concepts in upholding their